Sound as an infrastructure of political circulation:

affect and video on digital platforms

Authors

  • Paula Gomes-Ribeiro CESEM NOVA FCSH

Keywords:

sound, Digital Platforms, Affective Circulation, Short Form Video, Digital Politics

Abstract

Short-form audiovisual ecologies reconfigure political communication as affective entertainment, dissociating messages from stable referents. Drawing on analytical configurations developed from user-generated videos within the digital ecosystem associated with the Portuguese party Chega—across platforms such as TikTok, Instagram (Reels), and YouTube (Shorts)—this article examines how sound operates as affective infrastructure and as an indexing operator that organises the articulation between the sonic dimension and image, with viralised musical excerpts constituting its dominant manifestation in the corpus, preceding interpretation and stabilising attention. The analysis identifies three recurring operations: (i) sound-driven audiovisual architectures, in which music, effects, and sonic motifs structure temporality and shape visual expressivity; (ii) inter-video repetition and audiovisual recontextualisation, sustained by recognisable musical cells whose prior circulation enables semantic displacement and facilitates mild forms of aesthetic disinformation; and (iii) infrastructural automation and standardisation, through models, sound libraries, and AI tools that normalise formats, orient sonic indexing, and distribute authorship. These operations inscribe the circulation of content associated with a populist party within regimes of ambiguity, frequently framed as humour, irony, or spectacle, while maintaining high affective efficacy. By shifting the analytical focus from message and authorial intention to regimes of circulation and infrastructural effects, the article contributes to music and media studies by demonstrating how the sonic dimension—materialised predominantly through viralised musical fragments—sustains contemporary dynamics of political communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Crystal. 2022. "Operationalising Cultures of Digital Engagement: TikTok and the Rise of Short-Form Video." International Journal of Cultural Studies 25 (1): 1-18.

Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.

Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, edited by John Law, 196–223. London: Routledge.

Clough, Patricia Ticineto. 2018. The User Unconscious: On Affect, Media, and Measure. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Connolly, Emma. 2025. "How Does Social Media Content Go Viral Across Platforms? Modelling the Spread of Kamala Is Brat Across X, TikTok, and Instagram." Journal of Information Technology & Politics. Published online June 19, 2025.

Crary, Jonathan. 2013. 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. London: Verso.

Debord, Guy. [1967] 1995. The Society of the Spectacle. Translated by Donald Nicholson Smith. New York: Zone Books.

Han, Byung Chul. 2015. The Burnout Society. Translated by Erik Butler. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Kassabian, Anahid. 2013. Ubiquitous Listening: Affect, Attention, and Distributed Subjectivity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.

Literat, Ioana, and Neta Kligler Vilenchik. 2023. “TikTok as a Key Platform for Youth Political Expression: Reflecting on the Opportunities and Stakes Involved.” Social Media + Society 9 (January–March): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157595.

Mina, An Xiao. 2019. Memes to Movements: How the World’s Most Viral Media Is Changing Social Protest and Power. Boston: Beacon Press.

Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Seaver, Nick. 2022. Computing Taste: Algorithms and the Makers of Music Recommendation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Shifman, Limor. 2013. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sloterdijk, Peter. 1987. Critique of Cynical Reason. Translated by Michael Eldred. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Sterne, Jonathan. 2012. MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Durham: Duke University Press.

Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zhang, Yukun. 2025. “Short form Video Platforms and Participatory Culture: A Literature Review of TikTok’s Impact on Digital Engagement.” Proceedings of ICIHCS 2025 Symposium: Literature as a Reflection and Catalyst of Socio cultural Change, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2025.NS29699.

Zulli, Diana, and John Zulli. 2022. “Extending the Logic of Platforms: Cultures of Algorithmic Modulation on TikTok, Reels, and Shorts.” Social Media + Society 8 (4): 1–12.

Published

2026-08-05

How to Cite

GOMES-RIBEIRO, Paula. Sound as an infrastructure of political circulation: : affect and video on digital platforms. Brazilian Journal on Music and Media Studies, [S. l.], v. 7, p. 1–23, 2026. Disponível em: https://revistamusimid.com.br/index.php/MusiMid/article/view/278. Acesso em: 22 oct. 2026.

Issue

Section

Dossier: Music, Audiovisual Media, and Affects in the Burnout Society